An interesting paper in Computer-Human-Interaction conference CSC08 described social search in terms of the entire searching process, from consulting with friends on what keywords to use, to sharing the search outcome. The research was based on interviews on Mechanical Turk asking for respondents’ recent search experiences, and concluded with some practical suggestions. After watching the presentation slides, I also exchanged some thoughts with one of the authors, Brynn Evans.
- ChatGPT will kill Google Queries, not Results
- What Job Postings Can Tell Us about Data Product Managers
- Amazon Go isn’t about no-checkout. Here’s what we missed.
- The Data-Product-Scientist-Manager
- “Alexa, add voice shopping to my to-do list”
- Feeling Lucky Is the Future of Search
- Learning to Play
- So Long, and Thanks for All the Links
- Marketing the Cloud
- Thoughts on Plus – Revisited
- Aardvark Advertising Amazon Apple Artificial Intelligence Blogging Chrome Cloud Computing Content Creativity Dapper Data Mining Data Science Delver Education Evaluation Facebook Facebook Connect Faceted Search Fail Gadgets Genieo Google IBM Identity Interest Graph Machine Learning Microblogging Microsoft Mobile Music News Readers OpenID Outbrain Personalization Platforms Posterous Privacy Product Management Recommender systems Research Retail Science 2.0 Search Siftables Social Commerce Social Graph Social Search Software Development Startup Technion TREC Trust Usability Visualization Voice Search Wikipedia XFN Yahoo
I like the title of your post, here!
I still haven’t found consensus in our collective notion of what “social search” is, although I tend to see it as exploiting a social network as an information resource (very similar to how Delver is intended to work!). Is social searching different from social search? They’re certainly related. If social searching means finding a person to help you with a search task, then that helps the overall cause. But that model may be quite different from a search for information through an established social network.
I recently wrote a blog post entitled “The Social Aspect Of Resource Discovery” which addressed this issue. The post contains an embedded Slideshare presentation – see http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/the-social-aspect-of-resource-discovery/
Brian Kelly, UKOLN
Thanks Brynn 🙂 I don’t think it’s really possible to find that consensus, as the term describes different aspects of the same concept, so you really should be looking for a taxonomy rather than a consensus. But then, again, I was referring here to the search act itself, or even just a major component in it (ranking), so surely it’s even more complex with the entire process.
Hi Brian – I watched your presentation with great interest and commented there. Thanks!
Ofer: Am wondering what you guys are thinking about in terms of social search after a year from this article… Ever in the Palo Alto area?
Hi Ed – interesting retrospective question. As you may know, following our acquisition, we’ve moved on from generic search to search in the context of commerce. If I revisit the concepts you two raised in that paper, I think our current work indeed moves a lot closer to the entire social process of search and discovery, rather than just the social-graph-IR by itself. I’ve just shared a sneak peak with Brynn a week ago if you’re interested…